Sample Invitation Email for Opening Weekend Concerts

One of our SOSMN Leaders sent this email to many of her friends the week of September 8. If you’d like to send a message to your friends and aren’t quite sure what to say, feel free to borrow any or all of her verbiage!

Dear Friends,

Maybe you like classical music. 

Maybe you don’t. 

Or… maybe you don’t know if you like classical music.

How about taking a chance to find out?

As a member of Save Our Symphony Minnesota (SOSMN) for the past year, I have been working – along with an army of music fans – to ensure the return of the Orchestra’s musicians to Orchestra Hall.  It has been a remarkable journey back from a 16-month lockout.

Our efforts succeeded.  The Orchestra has been saved.  Now it needs YOUR support to thrive.

The opening of the 2014-15 Minnesota Orchestra Season – on September 26, 27 and 28 – will be spectacular.  Dubbed “A Grand New Beginning” it will feature a colorful, powerful, emotional showcase of the finest talents and best-honed skills of our magnificent musicians and Osmo Vänskä, the Conductor/Music Director.

I invite you to visit http://www.minnesotaorchestra.org/buy/tickets/browse-calendar/eventdetail/332/-/season-opening-a-grand-new-beginning#.VA8VVPldV3k to explore options for attending one concert (just one—to see if you like it) and to support, in spirit or body, what is genuinely one of the most important and valuable elements of Minnesota’s cultural landscape.

Opening weekend will feature Mahler’s monumental Symphony No. 2 “Resurrection” and Barber’s Cello Concerto.  Neither should be missed. In addition, a variety of celebratory activities are scheduled for the Atrium and Lobby before and after each of these opening weekend concerts (including a trivia contest with prizes, music in the Lobby, photo booths for your participation in a giant photo mosaic, and more).

[My husband] and I are going and will gladly meet you there either Friday or Saturday evening.

Go ahead.  Call the orchestra or check out their website and buy tickets. Make a date with friends or significant others for a wonderful night out in downtown Minneapolis. I predict you will not be disappointed. 

No need to respond to me, unless you have questions.

Thanks for your time in reading this.

Hope to see you at Orchestra Hall.

Sincerely,

[SOSMN member]

 

Advertisement
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

SOSMN to City of Mpls: If Granting MOA a One-Year Exemption, Attach Certain Conditions

On March 24, Save Our Symphony MN wrote a fifth letter to Minneapolis Community Planning & Economic Development (CPED) Interim Executive Director Chuck Lutz, copying Mayor Betsy Hodges and City Attorney Susan Segal. Our letter follows the announcement of MOA President/CEO Michael Henson’s August 31 departure and argues that his departure does not cure the defaults described in our previous correspondence.

However, recognizing that the City might want to give new MOA management an opportunity to demonstrate that it can comply with the terms of the Lease going forward and thus grant an exemption until the next annual report (due December 31), we recommend that such an exemption be granted only on certain conditions, including changes in MOA governance to provide for public participation as well as public disclosure of financial information and Board minutes. Our letter can be read/downloaded here:  SOS Letter to City of Minneapolis CPED (03-24-2014)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

SOSMN to City of Mpls: MOA’s Revised Annual Report Still Raises Concerns

On March 3, the Minnesota Orchestral Association (MOA) delivered a revised annual report to the City of Minneapolis, required by MOA’s Lease of Orchestra Hall from the City.  They were asked to revise their initial report of December 12 in light of the January 14 contract settlement and their resulting ability to more reliably plan the rest of this Season and the 2014-2015 Season, as well as more reliably forecast contributed income.  The MOA’s March 3 report can be found here:  http://tinyurl.com/MOA-report-2014-03-03

On March 17, Save Our Symphony MN wrote a fourth letter to Minneapolis Community Planning & Economic Development (CPED) Interim Executive Director Chuck Lutz, copying Mayor Betsy Hodges and City Attorney Susan Segal. Our letter analyzes MOA’s revised annual report in detail and reasserts that MOA is in Default.

In addition, we express our continuing significant concerns about MOA’s viability and its ability to comply with the terms of the Lease.  We identify serious obstacles to restoring the artistic and financial health of the Minnesota Orchestra, including the apparent division on the MOA board about bringing back Osmo Vänskä as music director, the perception that the recent settlement is simply a step in a process that will continue until significant musician salary reductions are imposed, the loss of several key musicians, and a loss of good will in the community due to all these factors.

SOSMN’s March 17 letter can be found here.  (This is a very large file, so it might take a bit longer to open/download):  SOS Letter to City of Minneapolis CPED (03-17-2014)

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

“Bring Back Osmo” Letters and Posts

Attorney Lee Henderson has shared the results of his February 1 StarTribune commentary piece with us at SOSMN.  About 2500 people responded, and Mr. Henderson summarizes the results and shares some of the comments in his February 6 letter to newly-elected MOA Board Chair Gordon Sprenger.  You can read this letter here:   2014-02-06_Sprenger_Ltr

 

You can read Henderson’s February 1 Opinion piece here:  StarTribune Commentary

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

SOSMN to City of Mpls: MOA in Non-Curable Default on Lease Terms

On Friday, January 10, Save Our Symphony MN wrote a third letter to Minneapolis Community Planning & Economic Development (CPED) Executive Director Jeremy Hanson Willis, copying Mayor Betsy Hodges and City Attorney Susan Segal.

This letter addresses which aspects of the Minnesota Orchestral Association’s non-compliance with the Lease requirements are potentially curable and which ones are not curable (e.g., the historical facts of MOA’s inaccurate and incomplete financial information to the State Legislature and to the City prior to execution to the Lease).

We reassert that these Defaults by MOA provide ample justification to the City of Minneapolis to terminate the Lease.

Click here to read or download the letter:  SOS Letter to City of Minneapolis CPED (01-10-2014)

SOSMN’s December 31 letter to the City can be read by clicking here.

Our January 3 letter can be read by clicking here.

Attorney Lee Henderson’s January 9 letter can be read by clicking here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Attorney Lee Henderson to City of Mpls: MOA not in Compliance with Lease

On Tuesday, December 31, and Thursday, January 3, Save Our Symphony MN wrote letters to Minneapolis Community Planning & Economic Development (CPED) Executive Director Jeremy Hanson Willis, arguing that the Minnesota Orchestral Association (MOA) is in Default under Section 28(I) of the Lease because information previously submitted to the State of Minnesota was not true, complete and correct. We requested the City of Minneapolis to take appropriate steps to terminate the Lease.  Those letters can be found in this blog here and here.

On Thursday, January 9, Attorney Lee Henderson wrote to CPED Executive Director Jeremy Hanson Willis, expanding the argument that MOA is out of compliance with the Lease.  Henderson highlights terms of the State of Minnesota Grant Agreement and the City of Minneapolis Lease.  He then dissects more than a dozen points from MOA’s December 2 and December 20 reports to the City, arguing that MOA’s data and assertions regarding programming and budget issues fail to meet even a cursory reading of the Lease. Henderson concludes that CPED must determine that MOA is not in compliance with its Lease obligations and refer the matter to the City Council.

Click here to read or download Mr. Henderson’s letter:  2014-01-09_City_Letter_re_MOA – Henderson

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

SOSMN to City of Mpls.: MOA has not Provided Complete and Accurate Financial Data

On Friday, January 3, Save Our Symphony MN wrote a letter to Minneapolis Community Planning & Economic Development (CPED) Executive Director Jeremy Hanson Willis, copying Mayor Betsy Hodges and City Attorney Susan Segal.

Our letter responds to statements made by the Minnesota Orchestral Association (MOA) following press reports on our December 31 letter. We address MOA’s claim that they provided additional information to the State beyond that provided to the Legislative Auditor, and reassert our belief that MOA has failed to provide complete and accurate financial information to the State.

Click here to read or download the letter:  SOS Letter to City of Minneapolis CPED (01-03-2014)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

SOSMN to City of Mpls: MOA in Default on Lease Terms

On Tuesday, December 31, Save Our Symphony MN wrote a letter to Minneapolis Community Planning & Economic Development (CPED) Executive Director Jeremy Hanson Willis, copying Mayor Betsy Hodges and City Attorney Susan Segal.

Our letter addresses the Minnesota Orchestral Association’s (MOA) December 2 report to the City and the supplemental information they submitted on December 20 at CPED’s request.  We outline our belief that MOA is in Default under Section 28(I) of the Lease and request the City of Minneapolis to take appropriate steps to terminate the Lease.

Click here to read or download the letter:  SOS Letter to City of Minneapolis CPED (12-31-2013)

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Two Responses from the MOA

This is a note that came from an MOA employee. It was sent to two SOSMN separate supporters, one in November and one in December. It appears to be the bones of a form letter that the MOA employee adapts to the situation, and we feel these notes exemplify the disconnect between the MOA and the broader community. Red text is where the two letters are identical.

If you hear any responses from the MOA and would like us to read them, forward them to us at saveoursymphonymn at gmail.com.

***

November version

Dear XXX:

I’m writing in response to your most recent email to our Board members. Like you, I have a long history with this great institution. I started working at the Minnesota Orchestra over XX years ago—because I care deeply about the arts in our community. This organization’s success is built by a community of supporters made up of audiences, management and administrative staff, volunteers, board members, corporate supporters, individual donors and more. Together we lift the musicians so they can create wonderful music.

Our CEO and Board of Directors understand that their role with this non-profit institution is to protect it. Serving on and/or leading a non-profit board comes with strict financial and ethical responsibilities, all of which are governed by law.  They want nothing more for this organization than to make it sustainable for generations to come.  If we do not make the changes we’ve proposed, the endowment will be completely depleted in less than five years and we will be forced to make even more drastic changes.

From my perspective, this organization couldn’t be more respectful and transparent. I’m perplexed why anyone would question that the very stewards of this organization are turning their backs on our artistic mission or our musicians when in fact they are trying to ensure that this Orchestra remains a vital part of our community for years to come.  Our volunteer board members do so much for this organization. For most of them, the Minnesota Orchestra ranks as their top giving priority. They not only attend concerts; they donate their time and more than $1.5 million annually to the Orchestra. In fact, they and the organizations they represent have donated $60 million to the Orchestra in the last five years. They earn nothing in return for donating their time and expertise. If they didn’t believe in our artistic endeavours, it begs the question—why would they give so much of themselves to support our musicians?

You can be absolutely sure that our board is of the mind that music directors and musicians aren’t interchangeable or easily replaced. If you could hear their ongoing conversations with board colleagues, staff, and community members on any and all subjects related to the negotiations, you would have no doubt about this. But this context is rarely evident in press reports or recorded interviews. The “sound bites” quoted in print or in broadcast stories are often the ones that provoke heated reactions. So the misunderstandings multiply, and the public doesn’t realize that we all feel a sense of loss when concerts are cancelled, or when a musician leaves the Orchestra.

Please know that in the weeks leading up to our latest proposal to the musicians’ union and Osmo’s departure, the Orchestra’s Board of Directors did everything in their power to reach a sustainable contract agreement with our musicians. We worked directly with a mediator, consulted with the Governor and collaborated with 15 generous Minnesota foundations who stepped forward with additional funding. The new funds were structured to enable a contract resolution that represented our best efforts to save upcoming performances at Carnegie Hall, which our Music Director considered vital. We were extremely sorry to see Maestro Vänskä go: it was our hope that he would see the Minnesota Orchestra through this challenging period.

You mentioned treating musicians like a “pops band”. I want to assure you that the Minnesota Orchestral Association (MOA) leadership team and Board of Directors is committed to preserving the future of this great orchestra and its classically trained musicians, whom we respect as superb and gifted artists.  We have presented non-classical performances in conjunction with its annual orchestral season for decades. Proportionately, this has remained the same over the years. From Cabaret Pops in the 80’s to recent Jazz offerings—the Minnesota Orchestra has offered a variety of musical genres.  In fact, the net impact of non-classical offerings help offset unusually high expenses associated with presenting classical concerts.  I encourage you to review the proposed contract on our web site. There is absolutely nothing that supports the idea that we intend to treat this Orchestra differently. To the contrary, the plan offers very specific direction around artistic initiatives.

You mentioned your concerns about our mission statement in your letter. One of the obstacles to making a counterproposal cited by musician leaders was: changing the organization’s mission statement. We’ve agreed to modify the mission statement to address musician concerns. I believe “art” is at the core of what we are all striving for. If you look at our strategic plan posted on our web site, it clearly outlines our priorities and intent—with artistic integrity being at the core of the plan. The opening letter from our board leadership and CEO clearly state this.

“Balancing great artistry with financial viability, our Vision for a Sound Future outlines three major tenets: to heighten our artistry and world-wide presence, to further develop our community connections through the expansion of Orchestra Hall and outreach initiatives, and to build a financially sustainable foundation. The plan calls for us to capitalize on the renovated Orchestra Hall to attract new audiences, strengthen artistry and reputation through regular touring, broadcasting and new media, and engage with our community through intensive exchange and collaboration.”

This is reinforced in our mission statement which emphasizes both our “performances and music” and our “financial sustainability”. The introduction of the words “financial sustainability” are not intended to compete with our primary goal of presenting great music. They are intended to protect it. It’s the fiduciary role of our volunteer board members to make sure the organization can function now and for years to come.  While it might be easier to ignore financial concerns and just focus on “art” the facts are that our goal is to continue to support a world-class Orchestra.  And that requires us to periodically negotiate contracts with our musician’s union. Contract negotiations require us to talk about finances and to pay our musicians a salary that our community can afford and is financially sustainable into the future.

I understand your frustration with the current situation; we are doing all we can to steady the ship in the face of deep disagreements over musician salaries, which are at the core of the dispute. We wish we had not experienced a “perfect storm” of conditions that reduced our endowment and produced a sizeable annual deficit, and we wish we could offer the musicians raises rather than pay cuts. To keep raiding the endowment to pay musicians’ salaries today means even deeper pay cuts in the future—and then the music would, indeed, stop.

Thank you for writing – we’re glad you care about the Minnesota Orchestra and hope you’ll return to Orchestra Hall when the music resumes.

Sincerely,

XXX

 

December version

Dear XXX,

Thank you for your recent phone message. Like you, I have a long history with this great institution. Per your request, I have coded your account to restrict future mailings.

I’ve served under many volunteer board chairs and presidents during my tenure with the Orchestra, and I can assure you that Mr. Campbell and Mr. Henson are both men of great honesty, compassion, and integrity. I’ve been disheartened by the musicians’ efforts to publicly discredit them as well as the rest of our volunteer board.

Our CEO and Board of Directors understand that their role with this non-profit institution is to protect it. Serving on and/or leading a non-profit board comes with strict financial and ethical responsibilities, all of which are governed by law.  Mr. Campbell and Mr. Henson, along with all our outstanding volunteer community leaders, want nothing more for this organization than to make it sustainable for generations to come. If we do not make the changes we’ve proposed, the endowment will be completely depleted in less than five years and we will be forced to make even more drastic changes.

From my perspective, this organization couldn’t be more respectful and transparent. I’m perplexed why anyone would question that the very stewards of this organization are turning their backs on our artistic mission or our musicians when in fact they are trying to ensure that this Orchestra remains a vital part of our community for years to come.  Our volunteer board members do so much for this organization. For most of them, the Minnesota Orchestra ranks as their top giving priority. They not only attend concerts; they donate their time and more than $1.5 million annually to the Orchestra. In fact, they and the organizations they represent have donated $60 million to the Orchestra in the past five years. They earn nothing in return for donating their time and expertise. If they didn’t believe in our artistic endeavours, it begs the question—why would they give so much of themselves to support our musicians? 

You can be absolutely sure that our board members are of the mind that music directors and musicians aren’t interchangeable or easily replaced. If you could hear their ongoing conversations with colleagues, staff, and community members on any and all subjects related to the negotiations, you would have no doubt about this. But this context is rarely evident in press reports or recorded interviews. The “sound bites” quoted in print or in broadcast stories are often the ones that provoke heated reactions. So the misunderstandings multiply, and the public doesn’t realize that we all feel a sense of loss when concerts are cancelled, or when a musician leaves the Orchestra.

This challenge we face can only be solved if all of us who care about the Minnesota Orchestra step forward and offer assistance beyond words of criticism and/or advice. We all need to be active ticket buyers and supporters to make a real difference. I believe this organization’s success is built by a community of supporters made up of audiences, management and administrative staff, volunteers, board members, corporate supporters, individual donors and more. Together we all lift the musicians so they can create wonderful music.

I can understand your disappointment in the current situation. I started working at the Minnesota Orchestra over XX years ago—because I care deeply about the arts in our community. I’m observing first-hand the difficult times faced by not only our orchestra but orchestras across our country. 

I intend to stay involved and supportive of this wonderful orchestral community as an employee, subscriber and donor and I hope you will do so as well. You clearly love the Orchestra very much, and I am personally sorry for the stress this situation is causing you.

Sincerely,

XXX

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

“Murder Most Foul: Minnesota’s World-Class Orchestra is no More, and its Death was no Accident” – article by Tad Simons in December 2013 MSP Magazine

Minneapolis St. Paul Magazine’s Arts and Entertainment editor Tad Simons is an award-winning journalist whose writing on the local arts scene has appeared in the Twin Cities Reader, City Pages, St. Paul Pioneer Press, American Theatre magazine, BackStage, Variety and the Washington Post. Over his 25 year career, Tad has covered theater, books, music, visual arts, dance, film, and performance art (including politics). Tad’s articles and essays on these and other subjects have won more than 30 local and national awards for editorial excellence.

To read the article, click here:  Murder Most Foul – Simons MSPMAG 2013 Dec

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments